Pleural Plaques - No Fault Proposals   - Sisman Nichols Solicitors - Clifton, Kingswood, Bristol
skip navigation

Pleural Plaques - No Fault Proposals


 

Pleural plaques are small, localised areas of pleural thickening on the membrane covering the lungs, caused by the inhalation of asbestos fibres. Pleural plaques are in themselves benign but their presence is associated with an increased risk of developing asbestos-related conditions such as mesothelioma. At one time, it was possible to claim damages for negligent exposure to asbestos in the workplace which resulted in the presence of pleural plaques.

In October 2007, however, the House of Lords ruled (Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd.) that ‘the existence of pleural plaques does not constitute actionable or compensatable damage’. This essentially means that people diagnosed with the condition are no longer entitled to claim damages.

In response to this judgment, the Ministry of Justice has published a consultation paper which examines the law and the medical evidence underpinning the Lords’ decision and considers the possibility of changing the law of negligence to allow compensation to be claimed by those diagnosed with pleural plaques, effectively overturning the judgment.

The consultation also invites views on the merits of establishing a ‘no fault’ payment scheme for individuals who have been diagnosed with pleural plaques through exposure to asbestos at work. Two possible approaches are put forward for consideration, which are:

to establish a ‘no fault’ payment scheme limited to those with work related exposure to asbestos and diagnosed with pleural plaques within a fixed period prior to the House of Lords judgment who had not already received compensation; or

to establish a ‘no fault’ payment scheme for all those similarly exposed and diagnosed now or in the future.

A no fault scheme would provide a payment to any qualifying person exposed to asbestos in the workplace and diagnosed with pleural plaques, without any requirement on the part of the applicant to prove negligence on the part of an employer. The paper considers:

  • whether any payment should be made and, if so, by whom;
  • the amount of the payment; and
  • the risks, benefits and costs of both schemes.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
 

Latest News

  Suitable Alternative Employment and Redundancy 
  TUPE - Split Service Provision After Transfer  
  Compensation for Illness in Unfair Dismissal Cases  
  Asbestos Cancer Victims Win Landmark Ruling  
  Employer Responsible for Work-Related Suicide  
  Business Fraud Booms  
  One Day Early is Discrimination 
  Agency Claim Rejected 
  Tips and the Minimum Wage - Proposals 
  Health and Safety - Increased Penalties Loom 
More...
 
Registered in England and Wales. No. 908396. Registered office: 11 Elmdale Road, Clifton, Bristol BS8 1SL

Home | About Us | Firm News | Our Services | Library | Help

Contact Us

Sisman Nichols is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
[smaller] Change text size [larger]